| Home Page | Whats new | A to Z of Services | Search Powered by Google | FAQs | Site Help | Making a complaint | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us | Access Keys Help | Skip Nav | Business | Community and Living | Environment | Working for Us | Transport & Parking | Your Council |
Search 
     
A-Z of Services  
     
Accessibility 
     
Translate this page 
     
Home Page > Community and Living > Community Safety > Anti Social Behaviour

Community Safety

 

Anti Social Behaviour

 

Within this section you can find out about different types of anti social behavoiur, including:

 

 

The definition of Anti Social Behaviour (ASB) is open to interpretation and discussion.  The definition that tends to be used is the one used in Section 1 of the Crime & Disorder Act 1998 to define the Anti-Social Behaviour Order (ASBO). This defines the effects of the behaviour rather than the behaviour itself:

 

'The person has acted in an anti-social manner, that is to say, in a manner that caused or was likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to one or more person not of the same household.'

 

Government initiatives to tackling ASB

 

In October 2003 the Government launched the Together campaign to support local agencies and residents to tackle anti-social behaviour in their communities.

In January 2006 the Government also launched the Respect action plan  which aims to deepen the governments current drive to clamp-down on anti-social behaviour and address a wider culture of public disrespect.

 

 

Section 17 of The Crime & Disorder Act 1998

 

Section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 states that, "without prejudice to any other obligation imposed upon it, it shall be the duty of each authority to exercise its various functions with due regard to the likely effect of the exercise of those functions on, and the need to do all that it reasonably can to prevent, crime and disorder in its area."

 

It applies to a local authority, a joint authority, a police authority, a National Park authority and the Broads authority. Therefore, the Act requires local authorities and others to consider crime and disorder reduction while exercising all of their duties. This reflects the reality that there are crime and/or disorder implications in decisions made across the full range of local authority services, and to correct the current situation under which these implications are often not recognised at the time decisions are taken, with expensive consequences.

Section 17 reinforces the requirement for mainstreaming preventative work. Crime Concern have produced two very useful documents which include good process and practice for local authorities implementing Section 17, both are available to download below.

 

Review of partnership provisions of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (January 2006)

 

A review of the partnership provisions of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 was carried out by the Home Office, the Local Government Association, the Association of Chief Police Officers and the Association of Police Authorities between November 2004 and January 2005.

The review concluded that Section 17 is still immensely relevant but that the time has come formally to broaden it's definition to require agencies to also take account of anti-social behaviour, behaviour adversely affecting the environment and substance misuse. In addition, the Home Secretary intends to take a power to add to the list of agencies to which section 17 applies by means of secondary legislation.

The review still supports a localised approach but has underlined, during the past eight years it has become apparent that there is a need for a set of standards that clearly sets out what is expected of each partnership and the roles and responsibilities of the inpidual partners. National standards will establish a consistent approach to partnership working across all CDRPs/CSPs in England and Wales. Compliance with these national standards will be compulsory and will cover a range of key issues which have been addressed in these findings.